Has the charging standard for housing pensions been determined? Relevant departments respond: false

On August 25th, a rumor about the "charging standard of housing pension" caused a heated debate on social platforms on the 25th. The rumor said that "the charging standard of Shanghai Pudong pilot housing pension was revealed in advance, mainly based on the area and floor of the house", and the details of the charges for different houses were also marked with a proper sign. Is the news true? The Shanghai Rumor Refutation Platform learned from the Shanghai Municipal Housing and Construction Commission and the Municipal Housing Administration that the rumor is not true. At a news conference on the theme of "Promoting High-quality Development" on August 23, the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development said that "the personal account in the housing pension system has been established by paying the maintenance funds for residential special projects. The focus of the pilot is on the government to establish public accounts." At the same time, in the interpretation of the relevant policies, it is clear that the funds in the public account come from public funds. In accordance with the principle of "not increasing personal burden and not derogating personal rights and interests", local governments will explore fund-raising channels and will not increase the burden on owners. The Shanghai rumor-refuting platform found that the specific figures involved in the rumors have already appeared in the detailed operating rules (trial) of the special project maintenance fund management measures issued by other provinces and cities in 2011. It is not the detailed rules for housing pensions. I hope everyone will treat online rumors rationally and do not believe rumors or spread rumors.